Caslon Analytics elephant logo title for Identity Crime profile
home | about | site use | resources | publications | timeline |::| Analysphere | Ketupa

overview

identity?

pre-modern

apparitions

conmen

honour

survivors?

cards

resumes

pollution

digital

statistics

costs

responses

insurance

Aust law

other law

memoirs

fiction

forensics

shadows

true lies

dead souls

gender

race

age

welfare

missing

landmarks








related pages icon
related
Guides:


Security &
InfoCrime


Governance

Information
Economy


Consumers
& Trust




related pages icon
related
Profiles:


Forgery &
Forensics


Surveillance

Biometrics

Credit
reporting


Vetting
Services














section heading icon     missing

This page considers fake deaths, ubiquitous identification, missing people and other perspectives on identity crime.

It covers -

It supplements the discussion of anonymity, privacy and surveillance elsewhere on this site.

section heading graphic     introduction

Preceding pages of this profile have considered appropriation of someone else's identity, construction of a wholly fictitious identity of 'editing' of an identity to remove an inconvenient criminal conviction or add a desirable degree or two. Perspectives on principle and practice are provided by questions such as -

  • do people need to have an identity and has one form of 'identity crime' in totalitarian regimes simply been resistance to categorisation or disregard of expectations that all people will be identified by the state?
  • how do liberal regimes address refusal by individuals to identify themselves, including instances where the person has been charged with an offence and those where there has been no charge? Is non-identication a basic human right?
  • what happens when an individual does not know who she/he is (eg because of trauma) and does not bear identification?
  • how do we deal with 'missing persons'?

section heading graphic     ubiquitous identification

Recent totalitarian regimes have sought to reinforce social control of populations - for example observation and delation by neighbours or colleagues - through requirements that all adults bear identity documents. Failure to carry an identity card or a residence permit was treated as a crime, one potentially addressed through an evening with the Gestapo or a trip to the Gulag.

Removal of an identifier such as the Yellow Star during the Holocaust was similarly an offence, albeit an action that saved some lives. Ubiquitous identity document requirements were apparent in liberal states during periods of military or economic crisis, with for example citizens and aliens in the UK and Australia carrying ID cards during the 1939-45 War.

Anxieties about pervasive identification was apparent in Australian debate about establishment of a national tax file number (TFN) and a national health services number, resolved through mechanisms such as non-provision of a TFN in some circumstances would not be a crime but money would be withheld or that health services could not be accessed at a concessional rate if the national identity card was not provided.

Anxieties are also apparent in online fora regarding political demonstrations, with people questioning whether they must produce some form of identification if requested by police. "Is failure to produce my drivers' licence a crime"? "Do I have to tell them who I am?" "What if I give a false name?"

Internal passports and residence permits in the USSR and contemporary China were a direct means of social control. They reflected practice in other states, where mandatory cards embodied social and administrative hostility to itinerants (people whose travel mean that they fell outside the pattern of of identification on the basis of 'where you live, who knows you'. That hostility might concern gypsies, or 'wandering youth' or merely people with 'no fixed address'.

Lack of address could mean automatically suspect when crimes were committed (or merely suspected of being committed), justifying preventive detention of 'nomads', "work-shy asocials" and 'wanderers' and vagrants.

Users of Stickam, a live webcam chat site with more than two million members, many of them teenagers, have been bombarded this month with messages that mention Stickam but promote pornographic live video sites.

section heading graphic     unidentified living objects

In an age before advanced biometrics identification of people assumed that individuals knew who they were (and could communicate that knowledge to others) and/or that they were known by others. What of instances where people were out of contact with their familiars and where there was some incapacity?

Documentation - from a passport or government access card to something as mundane as house key - constructs identity and provides a surrogate for personal memory. Some individuals do not remember their own identity (because of, for example, trauma or a condition such as Alzheimers), do not bear identity documents and are isolated from colleagues, family or carers.

Management of what Geoff Stewart gently terms "the perpetually bewildered" has shifted from incarceration ('it doesn't matter that you don't know who you are as long as we have you physically confined') to measures such as RFID bracelets and subdermal chips. Uniforms worn by inmates have traditionally signalled to the general population that people have been 'lost' by their 'keeper' and should be returned to that carer, who will identify them.

Recognition of people with no memory and no identifiers varies. A preceding page highlighted the example of Anna Anderson, fished out of the Landwehr canal - sans paper, sans memory? - and 'recognised' as the missing daughter of the late Tsar Nicholas II.

Another example was competition to claim one of the numerous French 'unknown soldiers', discussed in The Living Unknown Soldier: A True Story of Grief and the Great War (London: Heinemann 2005) by Jean-Yves Le Naour, a tale sadder than that in Hollywood amnesia fantasies such as Unknown White Male (2005) and The Bourne Identity (2001).

section heading graphic     missing persons

Around 30,000 people are reported missing to Australian police forces and non-police tracing services (eg the Australian Red Cross and Salvation Army) each year. The majority (approximately 28,500, with equal numbers of males and females) are reported to police. Some 85% of those reported to police are located within a week (95% within a month), with the missing person making contact or returning home in approximately 50% of cases. 55% of reports concern children and young people; there are substantial numbers of absences from institutions responsible for adults.

In the US some 900,000 people are reported missing each year. Around 790,000 of the 840,279 missing person cases in 2001 were people younger than 18. As in Australia, most absences were short-term.





icon for link to next page   next page (landmarks)

 

 


this site
the web

Google

 

version of May 2008
© Bruce Arnold 1997-2026
caslon.com.au | caslon analytics