| overview
 concepts
 
 Australia
 
 UK
 
 Canada
 
 US
 
 Europe
 elsewhere 
                         cases
 online
 
 blacklists
 
 mutiny
 
 landmarks
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  related
 Guides:
 
 Free speech & censorship
 
 Hatespeech
 & politics
 
 Governance
 
 Security
 & InfoCrime
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  related
 Profiles:
 
 Flag burning
 
 Surveillance
 
 |  elsewhere 
 This page discusses other sedition regimes
 
 It covers -
 As 
                        with the preceding page it supplements the discussion 
                        elsewhere on this site of censorship 
                        and hatespeech.
 
  Asia 
                        and Africa 
 States in Asia and Africa have recurrently deployed sedition 
                        and security legislation that derives from their UK and 
                        French colonial heritage. Those regimes but omits acontemporary 
                        constraints.
 
 Gambian law, for example, chills an independent press 
                        through prison terms for reporters found guilty of sedition 
                        - broadly defined - or libel and a requirement that newspaper 
                        proprietors must sign a US$16,600 bond (with their houses 
                        as guarantees) to be allowed to publish.
 
 In 2008 UK missionaries David and Fiona Fulton were sentenced 
                        to a year's hard labour in a Gambian prison over "seditious" 
                        email to friends in London describing the latest Gambian 
                        President as a madman. They were also fined £6,250 
                        each. They pleaded guilty to charges of "printing, 
                        publishing or reproducing publications with intent to 
                        bring hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against 
                        the president or the government".
 
 Malaysia and Singapore have both made active use of sedition/anti-terrorism 
                        legislation to silence internal political dissent and 
                        online expression. Chinese law and practice features substantial 
                        restrictions against criticism of the Communist Party 
                        and against statements by/for the Falun Gong sect.
 
 Law in the Hong Kong SAR melds UK and PRC rigour. The 
                        Crimes Ordinance for example deals with "acts done 
                        with a seditious intent, the uttering of seditious words, 
                        dealing with seditious publication or the possession of 
                        such publications". Sedition encompasses an intent 
                        to counsel disobedience to law or to any lawful order, 
                        or to raise discontent or disaffection among Hong Kong 
                        inhabitants. Substantive effects are not required for 
                        prosecution, with courts instead considering the defendant's 
                        words have a tendency to incite disobedience or discontent 
                        rather than an intent to incite violence. A 'seditious 
                        intent' is not required for prosecution of those who deal 
                        with or possess seditious publications.
 
 In Malaysia the 1948 Sedition Act, a relic of that era's 
                        state of emergency, deals with anyone who, does or attempts 
                        to do, or makes any preparation to do, or conspires with 
                        any person to do any act that has or would have a seditious 
                        tendency, who utters any seditious words, or who prints, 
                        publishes or imports any seditious publication. It is 
                        a crime to possess without lawful excuse any seditious 
                        publication. A seditious tendency includes a tendency 
                        to "question any matter, right, status, position, 
                        privilege, sovereignty or prerogative established or protected 
                        by the provisions of part III of the Federal constitution".
 
 Recent perspectives from China and Malaysia are the RSF 
                        report 
                        on Chinese censorship of chat rooms, the 2003 Information 
                        Control and Self-Censorship in the PRC and the Spread 
                        of SARS report (PDF) 
                        by the US Congressional Executive Commission on China, 
                        the 2003 Memorandum on the Malaysian Sedition Act 
                        1948 (PDF) 
                        by Article 19 and Davidson, Friesen & Jackson's 2001 
                        'Lawyers and the Rule of Law on Trial: Sedition Prosecutions 
                        in Malaysia 'in Criminal Law Forum 2001. A perspective 
                        on practice in Singapore is provided by Chris Lydgate's 
                        Lee's Law: How Singapore Crushes Dissent (Melbourne: 
                        Scribe 2003)
 
 
  Oceania 
 States in the Pacific have made increasing use of sedition 
                        prosecutions to dampen criticism. In 1997 for example 
                        Taimi 'o Tonga editor Filokalafi 'Akau'ola was 
                        charged with sedition after criticising corruption in 
                        the Tongan establishment. The newspaper subsequently moved 
                        offshore. In 2003 the Tongan Supreme Court twice overturned 
                        a government ban on its import based on claims that it 
                        was seditious. Sedition prosecutions have elsewhere been 
                        used in Fiji (particularly after the Rambuka coup), the 
                        Cook Islands, Papua New Guinea and Solomons.
 
 
 
 
 
  next page  (cases) 
 
 
 | 
                        
                        
                         |