| overview
 concepts
 
 Australia
 
 UK
 Canada 
                        
 US
 
 Europe
 
 elsewhere
 cases
 online
 
 blacklists
 
 mutiny
 
 landmarks
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  related
 Guides:
 
 Free speech & censorship
 
 Hatespeech
 & politics
 
 Governance
 
 Security
 & InfoCrime
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  related
 Profiles:
 
 Flag burning
 
 Surveillance
 
 |  Canada and New Zealand 
 This page discusses other sedition regimes
 
 It covers -
 As 
                        with the preceding page it supplements the discussion 
                        elsewhere on this site of censorship 
                        and hatespeech.
 
  Canada 
 The Canadian regime derives from the UK.
 
 Part II of the Canadian Criminal Code deals with 'Offences 
                        against Public Order'. It includes sedition (ss. 59-61), 
                        treason (ss. 46-50), sabotage (s. 52), incitement to mutiny 
                        (s. 53) and an offence of intimidating Parliament or the 
                        legislature of a province by an act of violence (s. 51).
 
 Seditious intention encompasses everyone who
  
                         
                          a) teaches or advocates, or
 b) publishes or circulates any writing that advocates,
 
 the use, without the authority of law, of force as a 
                          means of accomplishing a governmental change within 
                          Canada.
 In 
                        1951 the Supreme Court of Canada - in Boucher v The King 
                        - held that although a leaflet by a Jehovah's Witness 
                        was intended to engender protest and indignation against 
                        the government (including the courts), that alone was 
                        insufficient for a conviction -  
                        An 
                          intention to bring the administration of justice into 
                          hatred and contempt or exert disaffection against it 
                          is not sedition unless there is also the intention to 
                          incite people to violence against it  sedition law in New Zealand 
 In New Zealand current restrictions on sedition under 
                        the Crimes Act essentially prohibit only the 
                        advocacy of violence or disobedience to law.
 
 It is not sedition to urge any change in the law, however 
                        radical, and political expression under the NZ Bill 
                        of Rights Act 1986 cannot be seditious. A school 
                        teacher was thus found not guilty of "disrespecting 
                        the flag" after incinerating one during an anti-war 
                        march in 2003. (The Australian flag burning regime is 
                        discussed here.)
 
 Section 81 of the Crimes Act currently makes 
                        it an offence to
  
                         
                          (a) To bring into hatred or contempt, or to excite disaffection 
                          against, Her Majesty, or the Government of New Zealand, 
                          or the administration of justice; or(b) To incite the public or any persons or any class 
                          of persons to attempt to procure otherwise than by lawful 
                          means the alteration of any matter affecting the Constitution, 
                          laws, or Government of New Zealand; or
 (c) To incite, procure, or encourage violence, lawlessness, 
                          or disorder; or
 (d) To incite, procure, or encourage the commission 
                          of any offence that is prejudicial to the public safety 
                          or to the maintenance of public order; or
 (e) To excite such hostility or ill will between different 
                          classes of persons as may endanger the public safety.
  
                        The right of jury trial in sedition cases was taken away 
                        in 1951, apparently over concerns that jury members might 
                        not share an anti-communist zeal, but was restored in 
                        1960. 
 Prior to 2004, with action against activist Tim Selwyn 
                        for seditious conspiracy, there appear to have been no 
                        prosecutions over the past 50 years. Earlier prosecutions 
                        are highlighted later in this note.
 
 Selwyn was jailed for two month in July 2006, having admitted 
                        to conspiring to commit wilful damage when an axe was 
                        embedded in Prime Minister Helen Clark's electoral office 
                        window in November 2004. He had admitted in court to "having 
                        a hand" in separate statements - variously characterised 
                        as media releases and pamphlets - claiming responsibility 
                        for the attack and calling for "like minded New Zealanders 
                        to take similar action of their own".
 
 He was concurrently sentenced to 15 months on fraud charges, 
                        including obtaining the passport under a dead baby's name, 
                        along with a birth certificate, benefits and four Inland 
                        Revenue Department numbers under the names of dead people. 
                        He used the false passport and birth certificate in 1993 
                        and 1995 to gain NZ$11,141 in unemployment and accommodation 
                        supplement benefits.
 
 
  treason law in New Zealand 
 Under section 73 of the Crimes Act, treason includes
  
                        to 
                          kill or wound the sovereign, to levy war against New 
                          Zealand, to assist an enemy at war with New Zealand 
                          and to use force for the purpose of overthrowing the 
                          Government of New Zealand. As 
                        in Australia there have only been a handful of prosecutions. 
                        The single execution appears to be that of Hamiora Pere 
                        in 1869 during the Te Kooti War. 
 Prosecutions and imprisonment for treason were undertaken 
                        on other occasions, with Ngawaka Taurua and 94 other Maori 
                        men for example being tried for treason in the Supreme 
                        Court in Wellington in 1869 following disputes about colonisation. 
                        Taurua and 74 associates were found guilty and imprisoned 
                        in Dunedin gaol but released in the early 1870s.
 
 
  studies 
 For Pere see James Belich's The New Zealand Wars 
                        (Auckland: Penguin 1988) and Judith Binney's Redemption 
                        Songs: A Life of Te Kooti Arikirangi Te Turuki (Auckland: 
                        Auckland Uni Press 1995).
    
                         
 
 
 
 
  next page  (US) 
 
 
 | 
                        
                        
                         |