title for Ringtones note
home | about | site use | resources | publications | timeline |::| Analysphere | Ketupa

overview

issues























related pages icon
related
Guides:

Intellectual
Property


Economy

Networks
& the GII











section heading icon     overview

This note considers mobile phone ringtones.

It covers -

It supplements discussion elsewhere on this site regarding intellectual property, the economy and networks.

     introduction

Until the advent of the iPod the commercial provision of ringtones was the most profitable online music sector. Improvements in mobile phone hardware and in networks has allowed fashion-sconscious consumers to 'personalise' their devices by adopting a synthesised tune or - more recently - a clip from a standard audio recording as a replacement for the standard ring, beep or brrr.

Some of those tones were created specifically for the ringtone market, predominantly female and under thirty. Others recycle contemporary or even classical music recordings, generally through licensing by one of the major record companies.

     basis and industry

Monophonic ringtones, as the name suggests, involve the mobile emitting one note at a time. Polyphonic ringtones comprise of note sequences that play simultaneously and concurrently, so that the phone emits chords and melodies. Both tones use MIDI files, essentially a set of instructions for the mobile's synthesiser rather than a true audio recording. RAF (Recorded Audio Format) ringtones - aka 'Realtone' or 'Trutone' - consists of a compressed digital audio file similar to MP3 and encrypted for use only with compatible handsets. It enables the user to have real audio as a ringtone.

The ringtone market features competition between mobile phone service providers, mobile phone hardware suppliers, record labels and third parties such as Napster and Jamster. Several record companies sell ringtones of their bands on their sites.

In contrast to Europe, where many mobile networks provide their own ringtone services (typically on a 'per download' basis), the Japanese market is dominated by third party content providers and many ringtones are downloaded directly from the particular provider's site (with a fee being charged to the consumer's phone account. Japanese consumers have moved to a subscription based mechanism, with the consumer paying a set monthly fee to download ringtones on a regular basis.

Global expectations of growth centre on expansion of the 'ringback' market, expectations that are likely to be misplaced. Ringback tones (aka caller tunes - or perhaps more aptly bling tones) let the consumer decide what music - typically a song - the caller hears when making a call, in contrast to ringtones (where the recipient of the call has the ability to choose the noise that signals an incoming call). Ringback tones involve automated downloading of a snippet of audio to the caller's 3G phone whenever a call is made to a ringback device.

Visions that ringtone providers will be able to leverage their operation to build large-scale mobile content businesses independent of telecommunications companies are problematic.

In 2005 UK-based Itouch was bought by Japanese mobile content firm For-side.com for £180m. Ten months Itouch was up for sale, as For-side.com pulled back towards Japan after a spree that saw seven acquisitions, including the mobile entertainment unit of Finnish company Saunalahti, and pressure from competitors such as such as Italy's Bongiorno and US-based Infospace.

During September 2006 Murdoch's News Corporation paid US$188 million for 51% of Jamba (the German company responsible for 'Crazy Frog' ring-tones). Jamba had been acquired by VeriSign for US$273 million in 2004.

In 2007 ring tone provider Musiwave announced that it was being purchased by Microsoft for US$50 million as part of MS plans for "connected entertainment". Openwave Systems had acquired Musiwave in 2005 for US$121 million.

     market size and demographics

Estimates of the current size of the ringtones market and its future growth are contentious. As with many upbeat forecasts highlighted throughout this site, it is clear that some advisers were wildly over-optimistic.

By 2007 the market for ringtones in advanced economies appears to be shrinking (in terms of number of tones downloaded and aggregate revenue), with growth likely to come from consumers in emerging economies (although intellectual property rights owners are likely to continue to have difficulty in making money in those markets).

In 2004 Juniper Research and the ARC Group published studies on the global ringtone market, claiming that it was worth between US$1 billion and US$3.3 billion in 2003, supposedly up to 10% of the estimated US$32.2 billion global music market.

Juniper claimed that the ringtone market peaked in 2003 at US$1 billion, with a forecast that it will halve by 2008. ARC, in contrast, claimed that the market was US$3.3 billion and would double by 2008. Most of the current market was in Europe and Asia (principally Japan and South Korea), with slower uptake in the US.

In mid-2005 Broadcast Music Inc. (one of the leading music rights management bodies)projected that the US ringtones market would surpass US$500 million in retail sales in 2005, following sales of US$245 million in 2004 and US$68 million in 2003. IDC Research had estimated that ringtone sales in the US were almost US$17 million in 2002, US$18 million in 2003 and US$375 million in 2004.

The 2005 Australian Mobile Phone Lifestyle Index by the Australian Interactive Media Industry Association (AIMIA) claimed that 30% of respondents had purchased a ringtone in the preceding 12 months, with most respondents purchasing an average of three ringtones and two games. The 13-16 year cohort purchased significantly higher numbers of ringtones, logos, screensavers and accessories. Females bought more ringtones; males among AIMIA's respondents bought more games.

UK specialist Xingtone.co.uk claimed regional differences, with residents of large UK cities or towns (72%) being more likely to embrace ringtones than their rural counterparts, although there was supposedly greater take up in Scotland (26%) and Wales (23%) - ahead of London (18%) and the Midlands (12%).

US-based PWS boasts that its customers downloaded 59 million tones during 2002, with a UK competitor claiming that it was providing 10 thousand downloads per day.

ARC forecast in 2004 that ringtone downloads would outpace the market for listening to songs on mobile phones and other wireless devices. Depending on whose crystal ball you polished, 551 million users worldwide might buy ringtones in 2006, with only 112 million users listening to MP3 files on their mobile phones.

By 2007 there was disappointment. M-commerce specialist M:Metrics claimed that the percentage of mobile phone subscribers in the UK, Germany, France, Spain and Italy recurrently buying a ring tone had fallen consistently over the past year, to a low of 3.4% in the UK. The corresponding figure in the US was a slump to 9.3%.

JupiterResearch claimed that ringtones accounted for 29% of the overall European mobile content market in 2007, down from 33% in 2006 (with a value of US$1.1 billion), in contrast to a 33% increase in the value of mobile games (US$550 million).

     futures

The next big thing in the ringtone market within advanced economies is lilely to be video ring tones.

Some service providers are for example offering short music videos, cartoons and sports clips to identify callers. That video appears on the recipient's mobile phone or PDA when the subscriber's call comes through.

 



icon for link to next page   next page  (ringtone issues)








this site
the web

Google

 

 

version of December 2007
© Bruce Arnold
caslon.com.au | caslon analytics