overview
OLPC
devices
issues
studies

related:
Networks
& the GII
Digital
Divides
Telecentres
Cybercafes
|
the OLPC
This page considers the OLPC - one laptop per child -
program, associated with the 'Hundred Dollar Laptop' (aka
XO).
Other
ultra-cheap devices aimed at poor consumers, particularly
in the Third World, are discussed in the following page
of this profile.
the
hundred dollar laptop
In 2005, some years after the announcement that a US$50
PDA for the third world was about to arrive, Nicholas
Negroponte of the MIT Media Lab proposed development of
the Hundred Dollar Laptop (HDL),
aka the XO. The proposal is associated with the One Laptop
Per Child (OLPC) group.
The proposed US$100 device was to be a "Linux-based,
full-color, full-screen laptop" that would be WiFi-
and mobile phone-enabled.
The vision includes a 500MHz processor and use of "innovative
power", with the boosters at the
MIT Technology Review commenting
Since
many villages in the poor world do not have electricity,
the machines may be powered by either a crank or 'parasitic
power' - that is, typing. Once turned on, HDLs will
automatically connect to one another using a "mesh
network" initially developed at MIT and the Media
Lab. In the mesh network each laptop serves as an information-relaying
node. Households that have HDLs will be able to communicate
with each other by e-mail or voice calls.
Most importantly, Negroponte wants every mesh network
to have access to the Internet. The laptops will be
loaded with Skype, a communications application that
provides free telephone calls. Consider: the most forlorn
parts of the globe might become part of the wider world.
The
device moved from a specification to a physical prototype,
shedding features such as the crank along the way, but
climbed to US$150 per unit.
Jaundiced observers might be forgiven for commenting that
the initial announcement was a useful distraction from
failed
overseas expansion by the Media Lab and criticism that
success in marketing the Lab's image has often not been
reflected in substantive output.
One Australian enthusiast for all things wireless sniffed
that "the strength of the $100 Laptop is in its colorful
case mimicking a laptop and the powerful marketing ability
of the MIT Media Lab". MacWorld's Cyrus Farivar commented
"the $100 laptop is a huckster's gambit - poorly
thought out, overly ambitious, and too sexy to be true".
Bill Gates, reportedly miffed because the HDL would not
feature Microsoft code, called for a specially configured
mobile phone that would serve as a computer when connected
to a television and keyboard. (In 2008 Microsoft reached
agreement with the OLPC; consumers would be able to buy
a MS Office-equipped device for an extra US$30, most of
the increase being attributable to extra memory rather
than the licensing fee.)
Negroponte (unkindly dismissed by critics as "all
icing and no cake") has characterised the HDL as
"an education project" for school children rather
than a cheap device for all users and as "both an
electronic book and a laptop".
At a WSIS event in Tokyo in May 2005 he commented that
Sadly,
most educational systems that recognize the important
need for computers meet that need with a roomful of
desktops to which a child might go for a few hours per
week. Computing should be like a pencil, you have your
own (versus community pencils) and use it for all kinds
of purposes, related to school, home, work and play
and
that
Bringing
the laptop home engages the family. In one Cambodian
village where we have been working, there is no electricity.
Thus the laptop is, among other things, the brightest
light source in the home.
Negroponte's
vision was that the governments of Brazil, Egypt, South
Africa, China and Thailand would purchase and give away
15 million units. Reality has proved more complicated.
India dismissed the proposal. Orders to buy some 3 million
units are soft. Intel supported the OLPC for six months
but withdrew in January 2008, referring to a "philosophical
impasse". OLPC denounced it as "shameless".
Negropone's optimism about stimulating education (with
a policy of not providing children with devices and interfaces
that they might ultimately use in an office) was reflected
in his comment that
In
fact, one of the saddest but most common conditions
in elementary school computer labs (when they exist
in the developing world), is the children are being
trained to use Word, Excel and PowerPoint. I consider
that criminal, because children should be making things,
communicating, exploring, sharing, not running office
automation tools.
That
vision was however critiqued in a sobering post
by former OLPC security director Ivan Krstiç in
2008, who stated that
I
quit when Nicholas told me — and not just me —
that learning was never part of the mission. The mission
was, in his mind, always getting as many laptops as
possible out there; to say anything about learning would
be presumptuous, and so he doesn't want OLPC to have
a software team, a hardware team, or a deployment team
going forward.
The
XO is tracked by Wayan Vota's OLPC
News blog.
next page
(other devices)
|
|