overview
identifiers
precursors
1980s
surrogates
2006
claims
costs
models
private
register
UHI
TFN/ABN
police
attitudes
futures
FAQs
studies
landmarks

related
Profiles:
Australian
privacy
regimes
Official
Registers
Human
Rights
Australian
Constitution
& Cyberspace
100 Points
Scheme
Forgery &
Forensics
Identity
Theft
Biometrics
|
overseas
models
This page considers overseas models for national identification
schemes in Australia.
It covers -
introduction
Overseas development of national identity card schemes
and entitlement card schemes is of interest because experience
in other countries provides -
- benchmarks
for community acceptance of mandatory and non-mandatory
security cards and entitlement cards
- rhetoric
that has been appropriated by proponents, opponents
and journalists
- indications
that some technical challenges are intractible and that
costs in Australia are likely to be significantly greater
than optimistic estimates released by some advocates
- perspectives
on what is driving development, including institutional
aggrandisement, populist resentment of 'welfare bludgers'
and misplaced faith in technological solutions for social
problems.
It
is clear that policymakers and communities in some liberal
democratic nations do not consider that a ubiquitous
national identity card (including one, such as that in
the Netherlands, that must be produced on demand) is necessarily
totalitarian.
It is also clear that there is widespread acceptance of
entitlement cards, with in some instances pressure from
community groups to extend the use of entitlement cards.
That pressure is unsurprising, given enthusiasm in some
quarters for 'fixes' or punitive mechanisms such as online
public Offender Registers.
what is driving development?
Global development of large-scale identity registers is
being driven by several factors -
- emulation
of peers
- political
opportunism at times of perceived crisis
- institutional
aggrandisement, with agencies in all governments exhibiting
a range of views
- solution
vendor enthusiasm (whether for overall systems or for
particular mechanisms such as biometrics, with national
registration for example seen by some observers as the
saviour of the ailing 'bioidentification-industrial
complex')
- perceptions
that substantial reductions in welfare fraud and other
abuse of government services are achievable through
strengthened registration schemes (with some analysts
mooting recovery of all costs through savings over a
three to five year period)
- perceived
opportunities to leverage substantial existing infrastructure
and data collections
- recognition
of the scope for improved service delivery in key sectors
such as health
- recognition
that the federal, state/territory and local governments
already maintain a wide range of registers - highlighted
here - of varying comprehensiveness
and detail
- perceptions
that there is (or will be) substantial community support
for mechanisms that address identity theft, terrorism
and other concerns
Contrary
to some of the more entertainingly conspiracist views,
much development thus has a distinctly ad hoc and tentative
flavour.
models
In considering calls for national registration benchmarks
are provided by Australia's peers.
The enthusiasm with which particular states have adopted
or maintained identity card schemes reflects their individual
circumstances but it is clear that registering all citizens/residents
(and even requiring those people to carry a card for production
on demand by a range of officials) is not restricted to
totalitarian states.
Liberal democracies with universal cards thus include
Belgium, the Netherlands, Israel, Luxembourg, Germany,
Switzerland and Finland.
Recent moves towards a national card in the UK have proved
contentious. Canada, as noted above, has considered the
utility and shape of national registration. Critic Morris
Manning commented
If
you have to produce a card to buy a car, to get on a
plane, to travel across the country or even to walk
the streets of Canada, then I believe we have changed
from a free to an unfree society.
That
provoked a response that most Canadians would be unfussed
about using the card in purchase of a car or air ticket
if the transaction was protected (Australians typically
produce photo ID at airports). Requirement to carry the
card for walking down the street was another matter, although
of course drivers expect to carry and produce licences
while on the road.
next page (private)
|
|